Comments on: The Christ files http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2009/04/08/the-christ-files/ Theology you can eat and drink Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:01:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41 By: Mike Bull http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2009/04/08/the-christ-files/comment-page-1/#comment-7899 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:28:27 +0000 http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=387#comment-7899 Yes, but then we don’t look smarter than our forebears.

]]> By: Daniel Franzen http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2009/04/08/the-christ-files/comment-page-1/#comment-7891 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:27:25 +0000 http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=387#comment-7891 Whenever I hear modern scholars’ claims that such and such book was written from 65-80AD (or later) and it may not have been Paul, or one of the other apostles, I always ask “why?” Why is late? Why can’t it be early? Or why can’t it be Matthew or Paul or Peter? And of course there is not even a beginning of an answer. And why has this ridiculously intelligent scholar chosen to cast his lot in with the skeptics and higher criticism. Sad.

Doesn’t the thesis above make more sense anyway?

]]>