Comments on: The Wolf and the Lamb

By: dustycups

dustycups — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 03:33:44 +0000

@john cummins: I suggest you actually do some research before you make sensationalist claims about junk DNA. This is in no way intended to offend you.

I also take issue with your likening evolution to a mythology. From a purely definitional perspective, it is nothing of the sort. Perhaps I’m being pedantic. Then again, I am a “heretical homosexual”. It comes with the territory.

By: Mike Bull

Mike Bull — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:15:36 +0000

John

Thanks for your comment. Apparently Junk DNA has been found to be nothing of the sort. But do we hear about this in the media?

“Junk DNA is a necessary mathematical extrapolation. It was invented to solve a theoretical evolutionary dilemma.”

http://creation.com/junk-dna-slow-death

By: john cummins

john cummins — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:11:51 +0000

Wow, I love it. If it’s clunky leave it clunky. I am always so concerned when the modern versions (based on the heretic homosexuals, Wescott and Hort) stip away meaning in their removal of clunkiness…

This reminds me of the fellow who tried to go back and forth on the creation issue with his evolutionary mythologies. My guess is that he would consider the 90% unmapped part of the human genome as mere junk material as other “scientific” geneticists often do. Junk DNA must be too clunky. It’s like saying the nails hidden in our houses are just junk (cause we can’t see them) and their removal would in no way hurt anything.