<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nostalgia for the Old Atheists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2010/05/08/nostalgia-for-the-old-atheists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2010/05/08/nostalgia-for-the-old-atheists/</link>
	<description>Theology you can eat and drink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2010/05/08/nostalgia-for-the-old-atheists/comment-page-1/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byron Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=5040#comment-3141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear, hear! More Nietzsche is good for the soul.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear! More Nietzsche is good for the soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Canaris</title>
		<link>http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2010/05/08/nostalgia-for-the-old-atheists/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canaris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=5040#comment-3140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What an utterly turgid thread replete with non-sequiturs followed DBH&#039;s article in FT!  On my rough counting, at least two thirds of commentators therein spent their time bashing each-other over their respective stock-notions of Aquinas, oblivious to Hart&#039;s status as an Eastern Orthodox.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an utterly turgid thread replete with non-sequiturs followed DBH&#8217;s article in FT!  On my rough counting, at least two thirds of commentators therein spent their time bashing each-other over their respective stock-notions of Aquinas, oblivious to Hart&#8217;s status as an Eastern Orthodox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
