Comments on: Q&A http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2011/03/18/qa/ Theology you can eat and drink Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:01:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41 By: Mike Bull http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2011/03/18/qa/comment-page-1/#comment-8355 Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:13:57 +0000 http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=7001#comment-8355 Hi Dave

Yes, Jordan and Leithart are in collusion. Jordan wrote about this years ago, and it plugs in with Leithart’s structural analysis. As you say, it’s good to question such theories — especially when they tend to weaken the testimony.

]]> By: Dave http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2011/03/18/qa/comment-page-1/#comment-8353 Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:37:22 +0000 http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=7001#comment-8353 I’ve always wondered about Q. It seemed to me more likely that the gospels were similar at points because they were written by witnesses to the same events… Nice to see someone taking seriously that possibility. I think it was somewhere in something James Jordan wrote (or was it you?) that argued for Mathew being the first written quite soon after the first events of Acts. The theory made sense to me, but you don’t hear much about that possibility from others. Are you aware of that viewpoint (assuming it was Jordan’s), and if so, is it similar to what Peter Leithart has to say?

]]>