<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That You May Prosper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2011/08/07/that-you-may-prosper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2011/08/07/that-you-may-prosper/</link>
	<description>Theology you can eat and drink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2011/08/07/that-you-may-prosper/comment-page-1/#comment-10825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=7415#comment-10825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It does indeed. In Sutton&#039;s study on baptism, he says that he sees two of the five points as sub points, making it a three-point, and therefore trinitarian, structure. I wouldn&#039;t hold your breath; he&#039;s a very busy Bishop in the REC and is unlikely to get it done in the next few years. All the same, the pastorate has withdrawn a lot of the legalist stuff from the first version. In fact, in his book on baptism, he gives an essentially FV reading of the covenant, which is nice. Apparently that has an older pedigree in the Anglican church than in the Presbyterian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does indeed. In Sutton&#8217;s study on baptism, he says that he sees two of the five points as sub points, making it a three-point, and therefore trinitarian, structure. I wouldn&#8217;t hold your breath; he&#8217;s a very busy Bishop in the REC and is unlikely to get it done in the next few years. All the same, the pastorate has withdrawn a lot of the legalist stuff from the first version. In fact, in his book on baptism, he gives an essentially FV reading of the covenant, which is nice. Apparently that has an older pedigree in the Anglican church than in the Presbyterian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bull</title>
		<link>http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2011/08/07/that-you-may-prosper/comment-page-1/#comment-10790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Bull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=7415#comment-10790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds interesting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/2011/08/07/that-you-may-prosper/comment-page-1/#comment-10788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bullartistry.com.au/wp/?p=7415#comment-10788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sutton&#039;s grown a lot over the years. I was just speaking to one of the deans over at Reformed Episcopal Seminary, and he informs me that Sutton is planning a total overhaul and rewrite of the book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sutton&#8217;s grown a lot over the years. I was just speaking to one of the deans over at Reformed Episcopal Seminary, and he informs me that Sutton is planning a total overhaul and rewrite of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
