I just didn’t want the point diffused (or confused) but expounded upon. I was also thinking that the multiplication of Israel in Egypt was social and the time in the wilderness (“proving”) ethical. The direction concerning robes is in Numbers.

I’ll think some more on it, but I think they are all visible and all involve some action. The point is who is ‘doing’ the action. The Father does the ‘cutting.’ Jesus’ scars are a testimony to the sign of Jonah, but they are not the sign. Jesus’ walking through closed doors is an expression of His investiture, but is not His investiture. Same as His being described as the Lamb in Revelation 5 is part of His Ascension, but is not His Ascension.

I really like your thoughts, but I guess I want to hammer in the big stuff first – Adam as the singular foundation for all humanity. I’ve found that with a subject like this, the force of the argument can be lost in a cloud of more minor questions if one is not careful – as the White House knows only too well.

The big pattern is being, hearing and doing, Light, Law and Spirit, so your observations do fit, but “fractally.”